The Responsible Representation Blog – Introduction
This blog will be one source of information through which The Responsible Representation Committee presents information about our mission, news about the issue of term limits and advocacy for responsible representation by our elected officials in the federal government.This first post will outline who we are, what our goals are, how we will achieve those goals and what you as a citizen can do to help.
WHO WE ARE:
We are a non-connected federal political action committee dedicated to advocating for responsible representation by our elected officials in the federal government. Our first mission is to impose a twelve year limit on the time that any one person may serve in the United States Congress. This would be a twelve year limit on serving in either the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives or a combination of both.
WHY TERM LIMITS?
Most Politicians at the Federal level work for their own re-election rather than to achieve the goals of the constituents who elected them into office. By limiting the length of time each person may serve in the U.S. Congress we feel it more likely that elected representatives will be more inclined to work toward the goals of the constituents who elected them into office. There are a number of reasons why term limits would result in more responsible representation, listed below are only a few.
- An elected official who knows they will likely have to return to work in the public sector will be far more likely to work toward enacting legislation that would result in a better situation for anyone who is working in the public sector.
- Lobbyists, Corporate Interests, Labor Unions and Trade Associations will be less likely to influence elected officials who will only be serving a short length of time in the U.S. Congress. Special Interests will be less likely to contribute large amounts of money in return for votes in favor of legislation that benefits them if the official they contribute that money to will be of no use to them after twelve years. Currently, backing a specific official has the potential to be a twenty to forty year investment. Studies also show that it takes many years for these special interests to exert such influence on elected officials.
- Eliminating the opportunity to hold a seat in the U.S. Congress for twenty, thirty or forty years would eliminate those who are seeking to establish a life long career in congress and/or who would seek such an office for power and/or financial purposes. We would be far more likely to see candidates who seek those offices for the betterment of society rather than their own personal gain.
HOW CAN WE ACHIEVE TERM LIMITS?
The first question asked of anyone proposing Term Limits is: “How can we impose Term Limits on Congress if it is Congress that has to vote to enact term limits?” In order to impose term limits on the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Constitution must be amended. Traditionally, the Constitution has only ever been amended by a 3/4 vote of the U.S. Congress. This is why so many Americans feel that the movement to impose Term Limits is a pointless endeavor, as it is very unlikely that those congressmen whose terms would be limited would be willing to vote to limit their own terms. However, the founders of our country had predicted there might in the future arise a situation where a change or amendment to the United States Constitution which is desired by a majority of the citizens of the United States would be opposed by those Congressmen who were the ones whose votes were necessary to make such a change. With this possible conflict of interests in mind, the framers of the constitution added an alternative to amend the U.S. Constitution that did not require the votes of either U.S. Senators or U.S. Representatives. This alternative was placed within the U.S. Constitution as part of Article V.
WHAT IS AN ARTICLE V CONVENTION?
Article V of the U.S. Constitution is a section of the 
ultimate Legal code of our nation that defines how amendments may be 
made to that document and the fundamental laws and basic rights which it
 guarantees.
The text of Article V of the U.S. Constitution:
The Congress, 
whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall 
propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the 
legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a 
convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when 
ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or 
by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of
 ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no 
amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred
 and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in 
the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its 
consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
The first part describes what is necessary for the U.S. Congress to 
amend the Constitution, however it is the second part that we must 
understand in order to amend the Constitution without the consent of the
 U.S. Congress.  The founding fathers made provisions specifically to 
enable the people, by way of their State Legislatures, to bypass a 
Congress that was hostile to an amendment proposed by the people and to 
call a Constitutional Convention where the states themselves could 
propose and vote on such an amendment.
What this means is that the State Legislatures may 
apply to hold a constitutional convention for the purpose of amending 
the constitution. Should two thirds of the current fifty states make 
this application, Congress is required by law to hold such a convention 
of the State Legislatures for the expressed purpose of amending the 
United States Constitution. If the proposed amendment is approved by 
this Congressional Congress, it would then be sent to the States for 
ratification. Ratification by three fourths of the fifty states would 
result in a legal amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
HOW WILL RRC PAC ACHIEVE THESE GOALS?
The very first effort in achieving this goal must be to
 educate the American public about the issue and how term limits can be 
achieved. Very few Americans are aware that an amendment to the U.S. 
Constitution can be implemented without having to have the support of 
those Congressmen whose power would be limited by such an amendment. 
Recent polls say that between 75% and 80% of the American public are in 
favor of term limits and it is only by making them aware that it is 
possible to achieve such a goal and how to do so that term limits will 
ever be imposed upon those serving in the federal government. Public 
outreach, by way of telephone solicitation, mail solicitation, social 
media campaigns and personal interaction with the public through word of
 mouth and public events will be the main sources of our public 
awareness efforts.  Petitions signed by supportive citizens and 
presented to state legislatures will be another important effort which 
will detail the scope of public support for the issue to those state 
legislators who will be necessary to call an Article V Convention. 
Finally, support of state legislators who are willing to support federal
 term limits, by way of campaign contributions and media support of 
those legislators will be the final push in achieving the goal of 
calling an Article V Convention.
WHAT CAN YOU DO TO HELP?
Involvement by everyday citizens is the only way that 
these goals can be achieved. Discussing the issue with family, friends 
and even business acquaintances will increase awareness of the issue. 
Sharing the website, blogs, facebook posts and tweets of the RRC PAC, 
especially in this age of social media, will be a boon to the movement 
and expose vast portions of the public to the issue. Finally, personal 
contributions to the RRC PAC are a vital portion of the RRC PAC’s 
mission. Printing, postage, website and domain fees, event fees and a 
variety of other administrative costs are prohibitive in our current 
economy, and the RRC PAC would be unable to effectively advocate or even
 to exist without the contributions of supporters.
As a 527 tax-exempt organization, we exist solely on 
the contributions that are provided by the general citizenry. We cannot,
 by law, accept contributions from businesses, trade associations, labor
 unions, or other corporate entities. Contributions are limited to $1000
 per year per citizen. By Federal Law, we are bound to use our best 
efforts to attempt to obtain the employment and employer information of 
any contributor who donates more than $200. Contributions made to the 
Responsible Representation Committee are not refundable or transferable 
and are NOT deductible as charitable contributions for Federal income 
tax purposes. As a federal political action committee we are bound by 
the regulations and oversight of the Federal Elections Commission and 
all contributions, receipts and expenditures must, by law, be reported 
to the Federal Elections Commission.  Any citizen, upon request, will be
 able to receive the same report of receipts and expenditures that will 
be provided to the FEC.
Information on how to contribute, how to contact us 
with any questions, more about what we do as well as term limits news 
and links to other information about the term limits movement may be 
found at our website. Please visit us at:
http://rrcpac.org
Bill Hirons, President, The Responsible Representation Committee
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment